This paper is a reflection on my experiences in teaching 'Gender in a Postc
olonial World,' based on my book Reorienting Western Feminisms. In this art
icle, I explore how difficult it is to discuss the differences between wome
n without falling into a dualistic contrast between 'us' and 'them.' I disc
uss several approaches, including Isabelle Gunning's notion of world travel
ing and Gayatri Spivak's idea of strategic essentialism. The article conclu
des that a major way of avoiding dualism is to address issues of difference
in specific contexts and by participants being aware of the political impl
ications of their learning and speech.
Is difference good or bad, biological, social, or historical? Is it a weakn
ess or a strength? Should we forfeit a notion of sexual difference on the g
rounds that all people, men and women, are not essentially different from e
ach other, but merely culturally constructed as different? Can these constr
uctions of masculinity and femininity be undone? (Holub, 1994: 235)
... there is no question that the ability to deal with difference is at the
centre of feminism's survival as a movement for social change (Gunew and Y
eatman, 1993: xxiv).
The opposite of equality is not difference, but, rather, inequality (Rita F
elski, 1997: 15).