Paternal investment has long been considered responsible for the evolution
of predominantly monogamous marriage in humans. However, male-male competit
ion resulting in mate-guarding and male coercion could be equally important
. In this review, I use a comparative approach to examine the effect of var
iation in human paternal investment on our mating system. I conclude patern
al investment is important but so too is mate-guarding. I propose a model o
f our mating system incorporating both factors. Variation in the mating sys
tem is explained by variation in male resource control and contribution, re
sulting in ecologically imposed monogamy or polygyny, as predicted by the p
olygyny threshold model, as well as variation in male-male competition for
status, resulting in socially imposed monogamy or polygyny. (C) 2000 Elsevi
er Science B.V. All rights reserved.