Rm. Rogers et al., Preoperative severity of emphysema predictive of improvement after lung volume reduction surgery - Use of CT morphometry, CHEST, 118(5), 2000, pp. 1240-1247
Citations number
34
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Study objective: To determine ho iv the volume and severity of emphysema me
asured by CT morphometry (CTM) before and after lung volume reduction surge
ry (LVRS) relates to the functional status of patients after LVRS.
Design: A histologically validated CT algorithm was used to quantify the vo
lume and severity of emphysema in 35 patients before and after LVRS: total
lung volume (TLV), normal lung volume (<6.0 mL gas per gram of tissue), vol
ume of mild/moderate emphysema (ME; 6.0 to 10.2 mt gas per gram of tissue),
volume of severe emphysema (>10.2 mt gas per gram of tissue), surface area
/volume (SAW; meters squared per milliliter), and surface area (SA; meters
squared). Outcome parameters included maximal cardiopulmonary exercise (CPX
) performance in 21 patients and routine pulmonary function in all patients
. We hypothesized that baseline CTM parameters predict response to LVRS and
that the change in these parameters may offer insight into mechanisms of i
mprovement.
Patients and intervention: Thirty-live patients with severe emphysema who h
ad successful LVRS.
Results: The significant decrease in TLV following LVRS was entirely accoun
ted for by a decrease in severe emphysema. The SA/V and the SA both increas
ed significantly following LVRS. The change in maximal CPX in watts followi
ng surgery correlated significantly with baseline values of severe emphysem
a (r = 0.60), which was collinear with TLV, and SAW. The change in diffusin
g capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide revealed a significant positive
linear relationship with preoperative severe emphysema (r = 0.37) and a neg
ative relationship with ME (r = -0.37). Change in watts revealed a strong r
elationship with changes in severe emphysema (r = -0.75) and weaker but sig
nificant relationships with change in TLV, ME, SA/V, and SA. Other measures
of pulmonary function revealed significant albeit less dominant relationsh
ips with baseline CTM and change in these indexes.
Conclusion: Using CTM, we have identified a close relationship between base
line severe emphysema, or change in severe emphysema, and the improvement i
n CPX after LVRS. These observations support a potential role of CTM in fut
ure clinical trials for predicting responders to LVRS and identifying mecha
nisms of improvement.