Study objectives: To delineate current chest clinicians' approaches to the
management of patients,vith life-threatening hemoptysis.
Design: Survey during a computer-assisted interactive continuing medical ed
ucation presentation.
Setting: The 1998 American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) Annual Scient
ific Assembly.
Participants: Chest clinicians attending the respiratory emergency symposiu
m.
Results: Most clinicians (86%) had cared for patients with life-threatening
hemoptysis, and 28% had cared for patients with fatal events during the pr
evious year. Those clinicians favored management in the ICU setting (95%) w
ith early endotracheal intubation (85%), and they tended to use a large-bor
e, single-lumen endotracheal tube (57%). The majority (64%) favored the ear
ly performance of diagnostic bronchoscopy during the first 24 h, Most clini
cians (79%) used the flexible instrument, a higher frequency than responden
ts at a similar symposium on hemoptysis at the 1988 ACCP meeting (48%; p <
0.0001). Most current clinicians (77%) had experience with endobronchial me
asures to control bleeding, but few (14%) found them to be consistently wor
thwhile. Chest CT scanning was often helpful in diagnosis (55%), In their m
anagement of bleeding, half of these clinicians favored the use of interven
tional angiography, even in operable patients, which is a substantial chang
e from 1988 when 23% had favored this approach (p < 0.0001).
Conclusions: During the past decade, life-threatening hemoptysis has remain
ed an important problem, Flexible bronchoscopy and interventional angiograp
hy have become increasingly established,, more widely accepted approaches t
o patient care.