Ts. Hallstrand et al., Aerobic conditioning in mild asthma decreases the hyperpnea of exercise and improves exercise and ventilatory capacity, CHEST, 118(5), 2000, pp. 1460-1469
Citations number
28
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Study objective: To determine the effect of an aerobic conditioning program
on fitness, respiratory physiology, and resting lung function in patients
with mild asthma.
Design: Prospective cohort study.
Setting: Outpatient rehabilitation facility.
Methods: Five patients with mild intermittent asthma and five normal contro
l subjects completed a 10-week aerobic conditioning program. Pulmonary func
tion studies and noninvasive cardiopulmonary exercise tests were performed
before and after the conditioning program.
Results: After aerobic conditioning, there were significant gains in maximu
m oxygen consumption ((V) over dot O(2)max; 22.73 mL/kg/min vs 25.29 mL/kg/
min, p = 0.01, asthma; 22.94 mL/kg/min vs 27.85 mL/kg/min, p = 0.03, contro
l) and anaerobic threshold (0.99 L/min vs 1.09 L/min, p = 0.03, asthma; 0.8
9 L/min vs 1.13 L/min, p = 0.01, control) in both groups. Although FEV1 was
unchanged, the maximum voluntary ventilation (MVV) improved in the asthma
group (96.0 L/min vs 108.2 L/min, p = 0.08, asthma; 134.0 L/min vs 131.2 L/
min, p = 0.35, control). During exercise, minute ventilation ((V) over dot
E) for each level of work was decreased in the asthma group after condition
ing, while little change occurred in the control group (68.48 L/min vs 51.7
0 L/min at initial (V) over dot O(2)max, p = 0.02, asthma; 65.82 L/min vs 6
3.12 L/min at initial (V) over dot O(2)max, p = 0.60, control). A significa
nt decrease in the ventilatory equivalent ((V) over dot E/oxygen consumptio
n, 40.8 vs 30.4 at (V) over dot O(2)max, P = 0.02, asthma; 37.2 vs 35.8 4 a
t (V) over dot O(2)max,max, p = 0.02, control) sand the dyspnea index ((V)
over dot/MVV) at submaximal (0.44 vs 0.38, p = 0.05, asthma; 0.32 vs 0.38,
p < 0.01, control) and maximal exercise (0.72 vs 0.63, p = 0.03, asthma; 0.
49 vs 0.62, p = 0.02, control) occurred in the asthma group.
Conclusions: Exercise rehabilitation improves aerobic fitness in both asthm
atic and nonasthmatic participants of a 10-week aerobic fitness program. Ad
ditional benefits of improved ventilatory capacity and decreased hyperpnea
of exercise occurred in patients with mild asthma.