These comments identify key issues that need to be resolved to evaluate the
impact or achievement of graduate training programs in clinical psychology
. Three questions ought to be addressed to evaluate impact empirically: (1)
What is a given training program trying to accomplish; that is, what are t
he goals? (2) What features of the program are designed to contribute to th
ese goals; that is, what are the means' and (3) How can the goals and the m
eans be assessed to elaborate their connections? Evaluating training progra
ms is not fundamentally different from other research and begins with a car
eful analysis of the constructs of interest (e.g.. program goals), identifi
cation of measures of the goals and the means, and considering, ruling out,
or making implausible the influence of other factors (e.g., student select
ion, faculty selection, curriculum) that, if not conceived of as part of tr
aining, could serve as confounds.