AIM: To provide information about the diagnostic and therapeutic impact of
magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and to compare the findings across diagnos
tic groups.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective, observational study of 2017 consecuti
ve referrals for MRI of the head, spine or knee at four imaging centres, Cl
inicians completed questionnaires before MRI stating initial diagnoses, dia
gnostic confidence and treatment plans. After imaging, a second questionnai
re evaluated clinicians' revised diagnosis and treatment plans in the light
of imaging findings. patients were grouped into nine diagnostic categories
for analysis. Comparison between pre- and post-imaging was used to assess
the diagnostic and therapeutic impact of MRI,
RESULTS: In seven of nine diagnostic groups MRI findings were associated wi
th a diagnostic impact. Diagnoses were revised or discarded following norma
l MR findings and diagnostic confidence was increased by confirmative MR fi
ndings. There was no statistically significant diagnostic impact for suspec
ted pituitary or cerebello-pontine angle lesions. In five of nine diagnosti
c groups (knee meniscus, knee ligament, multiple sclerosis, lumbar and cerv
ical spine) MRI findings had a clear impact on treatment plans.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that in most diagnostic categories, MRI
influences diagnosis and treatment. However, experimental studies are need
ed to prove that these diagnostic and therapeutic impacts lead to improved
health. (C) 2000 The Royal College of Radiologists.