Gj. Loughrey et al., Magnetic resonance imaging in the management of suspected spinal canal disease in patients with known malignancy, CLIN RADIOL, 55(11), 2000, pp. 849-855
AIM: The aim of this study was to examine the spectrum of spinal canal dise
ase in patients with known malignancy using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI
).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and fifty-five patients underwent a tota
l of 159 spinal MRI examinations over a three-year period. Patients were ex
amined using a 1.0T magnet and a phased array surface spine coil. Sagittal
Ti weighted spin echo and STIR sequences were routinely employed. Axial T1
and T2 weighted spin echo images were obtained at sites of identified patho
logy. Contrast enhanced sagittal and axial T1 weighted spin echo images wer
e acquired when the unenhanced appearances did not correlate with the clini
cal findings or when the images suggested intradural or intramedullary dise
ase.
RESULTS: Malignant disease affecting the spinal cord or cauda equina was no
ted in 104/159 (65%) patients (extradural n = 78, intradural II = 20, intra
medullary n = 7); one patient had evidence of both intradural and intramedu
llary deposits. Multiple levels of extradural cord/cauda equina compression
were present in 18/78 patients (23%). The thoracic spine was the most freq
uently affected (74%). Bone elements were the major component of extradural
compression in 11/78 patients (14%). Intradural metastases were multiple i
n 15/20 patients (75%). Pour of the six solitary intramedullary metastases
were situated in the conus medullaris.
CONCLUSION: Magnetic resonance imaging of the entire spine is the investiga
tion of choice in patients crith known malignancy and suspected spinal cana
l disease. Contrast-enhanced images should be acquired when the unenhanced
appearances do not correlate with the clinical findings or when they sugges
t intradural or intramedullary disease. (C) 2000 The Royal College of Radio
logists.