Mental health care has traditionally,focused on the need to document relief
of specific symptoms of a psychiatric disorder; as well as how the patient
functions in social roles. Recently, there has been inn-eased attention pa
id to the issue of quality of life (QOL) and psychiatric illness. There has
been a growing recognition that different treatment options may vary in th
eir effects on the patient's ability to function in multiple life domains.
Studies focusing on the QOL ill patients suffering from mood and anxiety, d
isorders have become more prevalent Depression and anxiety disorders impose
a substantial cost on society in terms of both psychiatric service costs a
s well as the loss of the individual to society through lost work productio
n. However a change in the severity of depression or anxiety, often correla
tes with a change in disability and health service utilization. Lately, the
re have been a number of treatment studies of anxiety, and depressive disor
ders that have examined the effect of treatment on QOL. Although treatment
may reduce the severity and frequency of target symptoms, the patient's ass
essment of QOL helps to differentiate a true treatment response and remissi
on front a partial response. The evaluation of what constitutes all adequat
e treatment response or remission is complicated and likely requires multip
le assessment instruments in order to develop a complete understanding. In
both anxiety and depressive disorders, the patient suffers from impaired fu
nctioning, which results in increased healthcare utilization. Because these
patients do respond to treatment, the idea of "wellness" as a high end sta
te treatment outcome should be an important consideration when selecting a
treatment option. (C) 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.