Background and objective: Coronary angioplasty (CAG) has become an acceptab
le method of treating an acute coronary syndrome (myocardial infarction [MI
] or unstable angina [UA]). It was the aim of this study to determine wheth
er the results of such emergency treatment differed from those after electi
ve GAG.
Patients and methods: Results of emergency CAG in 581 patients (aged 60 +/-
11 years; 77% males) admitted to the authors' hospital between July 1994 a
nd December 1996 were compared with those of elective CAG in 2460 patients
(aged 61 +/- 10, admitted during the same period. Follow-up information was
obtained after 22.4 +/- 11 months in 93.2% of the patients by examination,
written answers to annual questionnaires, data being collected on survival
, repeat cardia catheterizations, other interventions, aorto-coronary bypas
s, occurrence of myocardial infarction, the patients' general state and dru
gs received.
Results: 19 of 517 patients (3.7%) of the group who had undergone elective
CAG had died during the follow-up period, compared with 107 of 2436 of the
emergency cohort (4.4%; not significant). There were also no significant di
fferences regarding repeat cardiac catheterization, interventions, coronary
bypass or re-admission. The proportion of subsequent emergency CAG among a
ll CAGs was 16.8% in the emergency cohort, 8.8% after elective angiography
(p < 0,001).
Conclusion: Coronary angiography performed in patients with an acute corona
ry syndrome has no prognostic significance regarding mortality and morbidit
y after the acute phase of the disease.