Quantitatively assessed coronary collateral circulation and restenosis following percutaneous revascularization

Citation
A. Wahl et al., Quantitatively assessed coronary collateral circulation and restenosis following percutaneous revascularization, EUR HEART J, 21(21), 2000, pp. 1776-1784
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems
Journal title
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL
ISSN journal
0195668X → ACNP
Volume
21
Issue
21
Year of publication
2000
Pages
1776 - 1784
Database
ISI
SICI code
0195-668X(200011)21:21<1776:QACCCA>2.0.ZU;2-D
Abstract
Aims A high degree of collateral supply to a vascular area where a percutan eous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) has been performed represents a haemodynamic force competing with the antegrade flow through the dilated lesion. Therefore, our purpose was to determine whether patients with rest enosis following PTCA have a higher collateral flow to the recipient vessel than patients without restenosis. Methods and Results In 200 consecutive PTCA patients, an intracoronary pres sure-derived collateral Row index (CFI) was determined quantitatively durin g balloon occlusion, using simultaneous measurements of the mean aortic pre ssure (P-ao) and of the intracoronary pressure distal to the occluded steno sis (P-occl), as well as the estimated central venous pressure (CVP=5 mmHg) : CFI=(P-occl-CVP)/(P-ao-CVP). Sixty-four patients had an angiographic foll ow-up examination after at least 2 months, and were subdivided into patient s with restenosis (>50% diameter stenosis, n=34) and patients without reste nosis (n=30). Patients with restenosis had a significantly higher collatera l how index at the initial coronary angiography than patients without reste nosis (0.26 +/- 0.14 vs 0.12 +/- 0.09: P<0.0001). Conclusions Patients with restenosis after PTCA show a more extended collat eral supply to this recipient area than patients without restenosis. Well d eveloped collaterals to a revascularized region are a risk factor for reste nosis of the treated lesion. (Eur Heart J 2000; 21: 1776-1784, doi:10.1053/ euhj.2000. 2129) (C) 2000 The European Society of Cardiology.