When government provides or arranges for health care, it is held to lower l
egal standards than private parties are, especially when liability is barre
d by "sovereign immunity." This paper examines sovereign immunity and its i
mplications for health care quality by comparing private-sector and governm
ent accountability in several legal contexts. It then considers whether the
law should be changed; the possible relationship between limited governmen
t accountability and public mistrust of a larger government role in health
care; and the potential role of disparate legal standards if a lower tier o
f care evolves in government programs.