This paper examines the economics of for-profit and not-for-profit hospital
s through the prism of capital acquisitions. The exercise suggests that of
two hospitals that are equally efficient in producing health care, the for-
profit hospital would have to charge higher prices than the not-for-profit
hospital would, to break even on capital acquisitions. The reasons for this
divergence are (1) the typically higher cost of equity capital that for-pr
ofit hospitals face; and (2) the income taxes they must pay. The paper reco
mmends holding tax-exempt hospitals more formally accountable for the socia
l obligation they shoulder, in return for their tax preference.