The U.S. health industry is experiencing substantial restructuring through
ownership consolidation and development of new forms of interorganizational
relationships. Using an established taxonomy of health networks and system
s, this paper develops and tests four hypotheses related to hospital financ
ial performance. Consistent with our predictions, we find that hospitals in
health systems that had unified ownership generally had better financial p
erformance than hospitals in contractually based health networks. Among hea
lth network hospitals, those belonging to highly centralized networks had b
etter financial performance than those belonging to more decentralized netw
orks. However, health system hospitals in moderately centralized systems pe
rformed better than those in highly centralized systems. Finally, hospitals
in networks or systems with little differentiation or centralization exper
ienced the poorest financial performance. These results are consistent with
resource dependence, transaction cost economics, and institutional theorie
s of organizational behavior; and provide a conceptual and empirical baseli
ne for future research.