When used for the fixation of orthopaedic implants poly(methyl methacrylate
) bone cement is prepared during surgery, and polymerises in situ. The tech
nique for preparation of the bone cement involves mixing the liquid monomer
and powder: two common mixing methods are hand mixing and Vacuum mixing. P
revious studies have shown that porosity depends on mixing technique. In th
is study, the fatigue strength of hand-mixed and vacuum-mixed cements is me
asured and correlated with the pore distribution resulting from each mixing
technique. S-N curves show that vacuum mixing improves the fatigue strengt
h by an order of magnitude. However, there is greater variability of fatigu
e strength associated with vacuum-mixed cement. This is correlated with the
appearance of an occasional large pore in the vacuum-mixed cement. If the
cross-sectional area is corrected to take account of porosity in vacuum-mix
ed cement, an 8% increase in the association of the data is found. Using a
two-parameter Weibull model, it can be shown that the vacuum-mixed cement h
as a greater Weibull life at the 50% probability-of-survival level. However
, if a probability of-survival close to 100% is required (i.e. high reliabi
lity), the hand-mixed cement is found to have superior fatigue behaviour. T
he S-N curves can be explained by examination of the fracture surface featu
res. The initiation stage of fatigue cracking is notably different for the
two different mixing techniques. The lower fatigue strength of the hand-mix
ed cement can be explained by the interactions of pores on the fracture sur
face causing stress concentrations, whereas no such pore interactions occur
in the vacuum-mixed cement. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights rese
rved.