Dry and wet brushite cements with various solid/liquid ratios were tested i
n compression and tension. Two different testing techniques were used to de
termine tensile strength: Direct Tensile test (DT) and Diametral Compressio
n test (DC) (Brazilian test), which is an indirect way of measuring tensile
strength on brittle materials. Statistical analysis of the results obtaine
d on dry cements points out a constant ratio between the values measured by
DT and Brazilian tests (DC/DT = 85%), The Mohr's circles representation al
lows us to understand that, for a material like our cement, ultimate stress
measured with the Brazilian test can only underestimate tensile strength,
because the compressive/tensile strength ratio is lower than 8, The second
consequence of this low ratio is that, in the Brazilian test, the plane alo
ng which fracture initiates undergoes not only a normal tensile stress, but
also a tangential stress component. Thus, the state of stress on the fract
ure plane differs from the one taking place in the direct tensile test, Con
sequently, with such a material (sigma (c)/sigma (t) < 8), the Brazilian te
st does not estimate the true tensile strength. (C) 2000 John Wiley & Sons,
Inc.