Purpose: To determine the safely, effectiveness, and predictability of phot
orefractive keratectomy (PRK) for the correction of myopia and astigmatism
after penetrating keratoplasty.
Setting: Gazi University, Medical School, Department of Ophthalmology, Anka
ra, Turkey.
Methods: Photorefractive keratectomy was performed in 16 eyes of 16 patient
s with postkeratoplasty myopia and astigmatism who were unable to wear glas
ses due to anisometropia and were contact lens intolerant. They were examin
ed for uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual ac
uity (BSCVA), and corneal transplant integrity before and after surgery.
Results: The mean follow-up after PRK was 26.0 months +/- 15.7 (SD) (range
12 to 63 months). The mean preoperative spherical equivalent refraction of
-4.47 +/- 1.39 diopters (D) was -3.39 +/- 1.84 D (P >.05) at the last posto
perative visit and the mean preoperative cylinder of -5.62 +/- 2.88 D was -
3.23 +/- 1.70 D (P <.05); refractive regression correlated with the amount
of ablation performed. The BSCVA decreased in 3 eyes (18.8%), and the UCVA
decreased in 2 (12.5%). Six eyes (37.5%) had grade 2 to 3 haze, which resol
ved spontaneously in 4 eyes within a relatively long time but caused a decr
ease in BSCVA in 2 (12.5%). Two of the eyes (12.5%) had a rejection episode
after PRK and were successfully treated with topical steroids.
Conclusions: Photorefractive keratectomy to correct postkeratoplasty myopia
and astigmatism appears to be less effective and less predictable than PRK
for naturally occurring myopia and astigmatism. Corneal haze and refractiv
e regression are more prevalent, and patient satisfaction is not good. J Ca
taract Refract Surg 2000; 26: 1590-1595 (C) 2000 ASCRS and ESCRS.