S. Naude et al., Iron supplementation in preterm infants: A study comparing the effect and tolerance of a Fe2+ and a nonionic FeIII compound, J CLIN PHAR, 40(12), 2000, pp. 1447-1451
The more widely used divalent forms of iron (Fe2+) supplementation often le
ad to gastrointestinal symptoms in preterm infants although little is known
about the use of nonionic trivalent iron preparations (FeIII) in these pat
ients. it is especially under this nonionic form that dietary iron is avail
able. For this reason, a randomized controlled study was undertaken to comp
are the efficacy and the extent of possible side effects in true groups of
preterm infants. In one group, the elemental iron was given in the Fe2+ for
m, while the other group received a nonionic trivalent iron (FeIII) complex
ed with polysaccharides of low molecular weight. Both groups received 7.5 m
g elemental iron daily. Measured parameters in the two study groups did not
differ significantly throughout the study period of 14 weeks. Both forms o
f iron supplementation were well tolerated. However, vomiting, diarrhea, or
constipation occurred slightly more often in the group receiving iron supp
lementation in the Fe2+ form without reaching statistical difference. The a
uthors found a nonionic trivalent polysaccharide-iron complex given as iron
supplementation as effective as the generally more favored ferrous sulphat
e. Since iron therapy is mandatory in the preterm infant, the use of trival
ent iron complexes can be considered as a good alternative. (C)2000 the Ame
rican College of Clinical Pharmacology.