This study examines the fragility curves of a bridge by two different analy
tical approaches; one utilizes the time-history analysis and the other uses
the capacity spectrum method. The latter approach is one of the simplified
nonlinear static procedures recently developed for buildings, in this resp
ect, a sample of 10 nominally identical but statistically different bridges
and 80 ground-motion time histories are considered to account for the unce
rtainties related to the structural capacity and ground motion, respectivel
y The comparison of fragility curves by the nonlinear static procedure with
those by time-history analysis indicates that the agreement is excellent f
ur the state of at least minor damage, but not as good for the state of maj
or damage where nonlinear effects clearly play a crucial role. Overall, how
ever, the agreement is adequate even in the state of major damage consideri
ng the large number of typical assumptions under which the analyses of frag
ility characteristics are performed.