In the context of a simple North-South model that focuses on the internatio
nal movement of capital, we show how neglect of pollution-generating effect
s of foreign investment may lead to distorted and misleading policy recomme
ndations. Such a neglect has recently received emphasis in the empirical li
terature on East Asian economies, as in Bello and Rosenfeld (1990, "Dragons
in Distress: Asia's Miracle Economics in Crisis," Food First, San Francisc
o), and was shown to overlook resulting tendencies in these economies towar
d specialization, away from agriculture and toward manufacturing. Our simpl
e model formalizes this observation and allows us to show that even for an
unspecialized capital-poor, resource-rich South, such pollution-generating
effects provide incentives for the North to encourage, rather than to disco
urage, foreign investment abroad and strengthen Southern incentives to rest
rict foreign investment more sharply than is conventionally assumed. In a n
utshell, it brings out the implications df Northern capital "creating its o
wn demand" as a consequence of its adverse impact on the Southern resource
base. Despite its simplicity, the model thus sheds light on three interrela
ted aspects of international trading relations: production asymmetry, incom
plete markets, and monopolistic advantage. (C) 2000 academic Press.