I here argue that the Indo-European language that eventually became Greek c
ame to Greece with a group of people who arrived from the north at the begi
nning of the Early Bronze Age in the later fourth millennium B.C. These "pr
oto-Greeks" entered a landscape that had been largely depopulated for centu
ries before their arrival and they soon came to dominate most of the mainla
nd of Greece (but not the Cycladic islands or Crete). Influenced by the Cyc
ladic islanders, they eventually created the Early Helladic civilization of
the third millennium B.C. The later Bronze Age population of mainland Gree
ce was largely descended from that of the EBA and the Greek language of the
Linear B texts of the Late Bronze Age gradually developed from the languag
e or languages spoken then. The pre-Greek linguistic substrate in Greek (e.
g., words with endings in -ssos and -nthos) may have entered Greek from the
language spoken by the previous LN II inhabitants of the Aegean area and p
robably also by their EBA descendants in the Cyclades and Crete.
The essay begins with a critique of the current theory that the "proto-Gree
ks" entered Greece at the end of the second phase of the Early Helladic per
iod ca. 2400/2200 B.C. and concludes that it is less likely than it formerl
y seemed to be. This is followed by details of the the scenario here advoca
ted, which is supported by the differences in character between the EBA cul
ture of the Greek mainland and that of the latest Neolithic culture and by
the probable existence of a hiatus of occupation between the end of the Neo
lithic era and the beginning of the EBA. Correlations with the evidence for
immigrations of Indo-European speakers to the Balkan countries to the nort
h of Greece are then sketched and arguments briefly presented for an associ
ation of the pre-Greek linguistic substrate with the LN II inhabitants. The
conclusions deal with some general questions related to the new scenario.