Many investors think of active and passive management as mutually exclusive
approaches in investment management; they are proponents of either active
or passive management. In the view of the authors, it is more useful to thi
nk of these investment management approaches as lying along a continuum, wi
th passive management using index replication at one end of the continuum,
and active management using aggressively concentrated portfolios at the oth
er end. Both investment management approaches have benefits and shortcoming
s. By combining active and passive approaches to investment management, pla
n sponsors, foundations, and endowments can maximize the benefit potential
and may minimize the shortcoming; of each to improve overall portfolio resu
lts. The authors compare the two approaches, discuss their historical perfo
rmance, and present a framework for combining the two on a strategic (long-
run), tactical (medium-run), and dynamic (short-run) basis.