R. Casella et al., Urinary level of nuclear matrix protein 22 in the diagnosis of bladder cancer: Experience with 130 patients with biopsy confirmed tumor, J UROL, 164(6), 2000, pp. 1926-1928
Purpose: We prospectively evaluated the value of nuclear matrix protein 22
(NMP22 dagger) and cytology in the diagnosis of bladder cancer.
Materials and Methods: We analyzed NMP22 in voided urine from 235 patients
before cystoscopy. Of the patients 130 had transitional cell carcinoma of t
he bladder and subsequently underwent surgery. In a subset of 200 patients
bladder washout samples for cytology were collected during cystoscopy. The
cutoff for NMP22 was 10.0 units per mi. For cytology only high grade atypia
was considered positive.
Results: Histology showed 77 superficial (pTa, pTis) and 53 invasive (pT1 o
r greater) tumors. Sensitivity of NMP22 was 51% and specificity was 83%. NM
P22 sensitivity was 36% for superficial tumors and 73% for invasive transit
ional cell carcinoma. Overall sensitivity of cytology was 52% and specifici
ty was 89%. Cytology sensitivity was 38% for superficial tumors and 83% for
invasive transitional cell carcinoma. NMP22 sensitivity for grades 1, 2 an
d 3 tumors was 30%, 56% and 68%, respectively. Cytology sensitivity for gra
des 1, 2 and 3 tumors was 30%, 50% and 91%, respectively. Combined NMP22 an
d cytology had a sensitivity of 70%.
Conclusions: NMP22 has sensitivity and specificity similar to those of cyto
logy from bladder washout samples. Particularly in low stage and low grade
tumors both tests show the same disappointing sensitivity. Because of a fal
se-negative rate of 49%, NMP22 cannot replace cystoscopy in clinical practi
ce, as the danger of missing NMP22 negative tumors is too high to rely on i
ts results in an individual patient.