Standing orders for influenza vaccination increased vaccination rates in inpatient settings compared with community rates

Citation
F. Lawson et al., Standing orders for influenza vaccination increased vaccination rates in inpatient settings compared with community rates, J GERONT A, 55(9), 2000, pp. M522-M526
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Public Health & Health Care Science","Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY SERIES A-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND MEDICAL SCIENCES
ISSN journal
10795006 → ACNP
Volume
55
Issue
9
Year of publication
2000
Pages
M522 - M526
Database
ISI
SICI code
1079-5006(200009)55:9<M522:SOFIVI>2.0.ZU;2-J
Abstract
Background. Hospitalization of older adults during the period of influenza vaccination in the fall of each year presents a barrier to immunization aga inst influenza. This study evaluates a program using standing orders for in fluenza vaccination to increase vaccination rates among hospitalized older adults and to determine the effect of vaccination on readmission rates for influenza-like illness. Methods. An influenza vaccination program using a standing order policy was implemented to vaccinate all consenting persons 65 years and older prior t o hospital discharge. This was a prospective, single center, cohort study i n a tertiary care university teaching hospital during an 8-week vaccination period in the fall of 1994 and follow-up during the subsequent influenza s eason. The vaccination status of each patient was recorded as no vaccinatio n, vaccination received in hospital, or vaccination in the community prior to or after the hospitalization. Hospital vaccination rates were compared w ith the rate of vaccination of older adults in the community. During the su bsequent influenza season, the number of subjects reporting symptoms of inf luenza-like illness (ILI) or who were readmitted to hospital with influenza -related illness was compared in an analysis of vaccinated versus unvaccina ted subjects. Results. Seven hundred and sixty-one patients were interviewed, and 332 of these individuals had been vaccinated in the community prior to their hospi tal admission. Of the remaining 429 unvaccinated patients who were eligible for vaccination in the study, 171 were vaccinated in our immunization prog ram, eight were vaccinated in the community after discharge, and 244 were n ot vaccinated. We were able to increase the absolute vaccination rate by 22 %, when compared with community rates, with our immunization program. The n umber of subjects with ILI symptoms or readmission to hospital was too smal l to compare the vaccinated to the unvaccinated group in the study. Conclusions. An inpatient influenza immunization program using a standing o rder policy was able to target a particularly high-risk subset of persons 6 5 years and over who might otherwise have not received influenza vaccinatio n.