Fm. Ivey et al., Effects of age, gender, and myostatin genotype on the hypertrophic response to heavy resistance strength training, J GERONT A, 55(11), 2000, pp. M641-M648
Citations number
35
Categorie Soggetti
Public Health & Health Care Science","Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY SERIES A-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND MEDICAL SCIENCES
Background. Because of the scarcity of data available from direct compariso
ns of age and gender groups using the same relative training stimulus, it i
s unknown whether older individuals can increase their muscle mass as much
as young individuals and whether women can increase as much as men in respo
nse to strength training (ST). In addition, little is known about whether t
he hypertrophic response to ST is affected by myostatin genotype, a candida
te gene for muscle hypertrophy.
Methods, Eleven young men (25 +/- 3 years, range 21-29 years), 11 young wom
en (26 +/- 2 years, range 23-28 years), 12 older men (69 +/- 3 years, range
65-75 years), and 11 older women (68 +/- 2 years, range 65-73 pears) had b
ilateral quadriceps muscle volume measurements performed using magnetic res
onance imaging (MRI) before and after ST and detraining. Training consisted
of knee extension exercises of the dominant leg three times per week for 9
weeks. The contralateral limb was left untrained throughout the ST program
. Following the unilateral training period, the subjects underwent 31 weeks
of detraining during which no regular exercise was performed. Myostatin ge
notype was determined in a subgroup of 32 subjects, of which five female su
bjects were carriers of a myostatin gene variant.
Results. A significantly greater absolute increase in muscle volume was obs
erved in men than in women (204 +/- 20 vs 101 +/- 13 cm(3), p < .01), but t
here was no significant difference in muscle volume response to ST between
young and older individuals. The gender effect remained after adjusting for
baseline muscle volume. In addition, there was a significantly greater los
s of absolute muscle volume after 31 weeks of detraining in men than in wom
en (151 +/- 13 vs 88 +/- 7 cm(3), p < .05), but no significant difference b
etween young and older individuals.;Myostatin genotype did not explain the
hypertrophic response to ST when all 32 subjects were assessed. However, wh
en only women were analyzed, those with the less common myostatin allele ex
hibited a 68% Larger increase in muscle volume in response to ST (p = .056)
.
Conclusions. Aging does not affect the muscle mass response to either ST or
detraining, whereas gender does, as men increased their muscle volume abou
t twice as much in response to ST as did women and experienced larger losse
s in response to detraining than women. Young men were the only group that
maintained muscle volume adaptation after 31 weeks of detraining. Although
myostatin genotype may not explain the observed gender difference in the hy
pertrophic response to ST, a role for myostatin genotype may be indicated i
n this regard for women, but future studies are needed with larger subject
numbers in each genotype group to confirm this observation.