Objectives. We evaluated a model of the process of preparation for future c
are needs. This model predicted that less concrete preparation activities (
e.g., becoming aware and gathering information) would predict more concrete
ones (e.g., deciding on preferences and making concrete plans), and that a
ttitudes (expectations of needing care and negative beliefs about the usefu
lness of planning) would mediate the effect of vulnerability (age, ADL/IADL
deficits) and resources (socioeconomic status, social network) on preparat
ion activities.
Methods. The Preparation for Future Care Needs Measure was used to assess t
wo attitudes toward preparation (Cronbach's alpha range:.66-.86), four plan
ning processes (Cronbach's alpha range:.75-.86), and the content of plannin
g for future care needs. In addition, demographic variables, social network
, and ADL/IADL limitations were assessed. Using path analysis, the model wa
s first developed on a West German sample (n = 280), and then validated on
an East German sample (n = 294).
Results. The best-fitting path models suggested that more concrete preparat
ion activities were predicted by less concrete ones, but not always in the
expected sequence. Gathering information, deciding on preferences, and age
predicted concrete planning. Indicators of vulnerability were mediated by e
xpectations of needing care in the future and several preparation activitie
s, especially becoming aware and gathering information. Negative beliefs ab
out the usefulness of planning inhibited gathering information and concrete
planning.
Discussion. The results suggest that preparation for future care needs may
be conceptualized as a successive process. Some individuals, however, may s
kip steps in the preparation process. For example, relatives may offer to p
rovide care before the older adult has to decide among her or his options.