In addition to C-14, a large set of delta C-13 data was produced at NOSAMS
as part of the World ocean circulation experiment (WOCE). In this paper, a
subset of 973 delta C-13 results from 63 stations in the Pacific Ocean was
compared to a total number of 219 corresponding results from 12 stations sa
mpled during oceanographic programs in the early 1970s. The data were analy
zed in light of recent work to estimate the uptake of CO2 derived from foss
il fuel and biomass burning in the oceans by quantifying the delta C-13 Sue
ss effect in the oceans. In principle, the delta C-13 value of dissolved in
organic carbon (DIC) allows a quantitative estimate of how much of the anth
ropogenic CO2 released into the atmosphere is taken up by the oceans, becau
se the delta C-13 of CO2 derived from organic matter (similar to -27 parts
per thousand) is significantly different from that of the atmosphere (simil
ar to -8 parts per thousand) Our new analysis indicates an apparent discrep
ancy between the old and the new data sets, possibly caused by a constant o
ffset in delta C-13 values in a subset of the data. A similar offset was re
ported in an earlier work by Paul Quay et al. for one station that was not
included in their final analysis. We present an estimate for this assumed o
ffset based on data from water depths below which little or no change in de
lta C-13 over time would be expected. Such a correction leads to a signific
antly reduced estimate of the CO2 uptake, possibly as low as one half of th
e amount of 2.1 GtC yr(-1) (gigatons carbon per year) estimated previously.
The present conclusion is based on a comparison with a relatively small da
ta set from the 70s in the Pacific Ocean. The larger data set collected dur
ing the GEOSECS program was not used because of problems reported with the
data. This work suggests there may also be problems in comparing non-GEOSEC
S data from the 1970s to the current data. The calculation of significantly
lower uptake estimates based on an offset-related problem appears valid, b
ut the exact figures are tentative because the data set is small and the ca
use for an offset remains unknown. Therefore, it would be desirable to exte
nd this comparison to the Indian Ocean where it is believed that better GEO
SECS delta C-13 data are available. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All righ
ts reserved.