The spinal cord contains endogenous substances (such as cholecystokini
n, FMRFamide, etc.) that can block the analgesic effects of opiates. A
nti-opiate actions have been most commonly studied by exogenous admini
stration of receptor agonists and receptor antagonists of these substa
nces. However, we have recently demonstrated that anti-analgesia can b
e brought under environmental control through Pavlovian conditioning.
Whereas analgesia can be conditioned to signals for danger, anti-analg
esia can be conditioned to signals for safety. Using this paradigm, we
have previously demonstrated that conditioned anti-analgesia can reve
rse a variety of opiate analgesic states, including those produced by
conditioned danger signals, systemic morphine, and intrathecal mu- and
delta-opiate receptor agonists. These data raise the question of the
generality of anti-analgesia actions. The present series of experiment
s examined the ability of conditioned anti-analgesia to affect non-opi
ate analgesic states induced by spinal delivery of GABA(A), GABA(B), 5
HT(2) + 5HT(1), and 5HT(3) receptor agonists. While conditioned anti-a
nalgesia had no effect on GABA(A) or 5HT(2) + 5HT(1) non-opiate analge
sias, conditioned anti-analgesia completely blocked GABA(B) and 5HT(3)
non-opiate analgesias. These findings clearly demonstrate that condit
ioned anti-analgesia can powerfully modulate non-opiate as well as opi
ate analgesias and bring into question whether putative anti-opiate ne
uroactive substances may have broader actions than previously suggeste
d. (C) 1997 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published
by Elsevier Science B.V.