Can chronic disability be prevented? A randomized trial of a cognitive-behavior intervention and two forms of information for patients with spinal pain
Sj. Linton et T. Andersson, Can chronic disability be prevented? A randomized trial of a cognitive-behavior intervention and two forms of information for patients with spinal pain, SPINE, 25(21), 2000, pp. 2825-2831
Study Design, A randomized controlled design super imposed on treatment as
usual was used to compare the effects of a cognitive-behavior intervention
aimed at preventing chronicity with two different forms of information.
Objective. To develop a coping-oriented preventive intervention applicable
in primary care, and to compare its impact with educational information.
Summary of Background Data. Preventing long-term disability resulting from
spinal pain has proved difficult. The information provided by health care p
rofessions and early interventions aimed at preventing long-term disability
may be important, but little scientific evidence exists concerning their r
ise.
Methods, A protocol for a six-session cognitive-behavior group intervention
was developed on the basis of earlier research. The main focus was to prev
ent long-term disability by changing patients' behaviors and beliefs so the
y can cope better with their problems. Comparison groups received either a
pamphlet shown earlier to have an effect, or a more extensive information p
ackage consisting of six installments. All the groups continued to receive
treatment as usual in primary care. There were 243 patients with acute or s
ubacute spinal pain who perceived that they were at risk for developing a c
hronic problem. These patients were randomized to the cognitive-behavioral
intervention or one of the two information groups, Because the aim was to p
revent long-term disability, the key outcome variables at the 1-year follow
-up assessment were sick absenteeism and health care use. Other variables w
ere pain, Function, fear-avoidance beliefs, and cognitions.
Results. The comparison groups reported benefits. However, the risk for a l
ong-term sick absence developing was lowered ninefold for the cognitive-beh
avior intervention group as compared with the risk for the information grou
ps (relative risk, 9.3). Participants in the cognitive behavior group also
reported a significant decrease in perceived risk. In addition, the cogniti
ve-behavior group demonstrated a significant decrease in physician and phys
ical therapy use as compared with two groups receiving information, in whic
h such use increased. All three groups tended to improve on the variables o
f pain, fear-avoidance, and cognitions.
Conclusions. This study demonstrates that a cognitive-behavior group interv
ention can lower the risk of a long-term disability developing. These findi
ngs under score the significance of early interventions that specifically a
im to prevent chronic problems. This approach might be applied to primary c
are settings.