We interviewed 419 adult women in Minnesota, who were selected at random an
d without a history of breast cancer, to ascertain what percentage could co
rrectly report that cure was the same for breast conservation therapy and m
astectomy, what percentage would state a preference for breast conservation
therapy rather than mastectomy, and characteristics associated with these
outcomes. Nearly all women (n = 360; 86%) had heard of both mastectomy and
breast conservation therapy; among these women, 37% correctly reported that
the two treatments were equally efficacious. Given a scenario where they w
ere diagnosed with breast cancer amenable to either treatment, 58% of parti
cipants stated a preference for breast conservation therapy. Older women we
re less likely than younger women to know that cure was the same for breast
conservation therapy and mastectomy (adjusted OR = 0.5, 95% CI 0.2, 1.0),
and women residing in urban areas were more Likely to prefer breast conserv
ation therapy over mastectomy compared to rural residents (adjusted OR = 2.
2, 95% CI 1.3, 3.8). Comparing these findings to women diagnosed with breas
t cancer in Minnesota, breast conservation therapy was found to be performe
d less frequently than preference for such therapy among women in our study
would suggest. Educating women prior to diagnosis about breast cancer trea
tment options, and exploring reasons for the gap between actual utilization
of breast conservation therapy and prediagnosis preference, may be indicat
ed.