Tj. Mattimore et al., SURROGATE AND PHYSICIAN UNDERSTANDING OF PATIENTS PREFERENCES FOR LIVING PERMANENTLY IN A NURSING-HOME, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 45(7), 1997, pp. 818-824
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate patients' willingness to live permanently in a
nursing home and surrogate and physician understanding of that prefere
nce. DESIGN: Evaluation of cross-sectional interview data from a cohor
t study. SETTING: Five academic medical centers. PARTICIPANTS: Serious
ly ill hospitalized adults enrolled in the Study to Understand Prognos
es and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments (SUPPORT). MEA
SUREMENTS: Patients' willingness to live permanently in a nursing home
was measured on a 5-point scale ranging from ''very willing'' to ''ra
ther die.'' Ordinal logistic regression was used to identify patient d
emographic and clinical characteristics associated with this preferenc
e. Surrogate and physician perceptions of patient preferences were com
pared with patients' responses, and factors associated independently w
ith surrogate and physician understanding of patient preference were i
dentified. RESULTS: Of 9105 patients, 3262 (36%) provided responses to
the study question: 7% were ''very willing'' to live permanently in a
nursing home, 19% ''somewhat willing,'' 11% ''somewhat unwilling,'' 2
6% ''very unwilling,'' and 30% would ''rather die.'' Older age was ass
ociated independently with less willingness to live permanently in a n
ursing home (odds ratio [OR]=.90 per decade; 95% confidence interval [
CI]: 0.85, 0.96). Patients with more education (OR = 1.03 per year; 95
% CI:1.00,1.05) and more disabilities (OR = 1.05 per disability; 95% C
I:1.01,1.09), and black patients (OR = 1.46 compared with white patien
ts; 95% CI:1.20,1.76) were more willing to live in a nursing home. Sur
rogates understood 61% of patients' nursing home preferences but ident
ified only 35% of patients who were willing to live permanently in a n
ursing home. Physicians identified 18% of patients willing to live per
manently in a nursing home. CONCLUSION: Patient attitudes about living
permanently in a nursing home can be elicited, cannot be reliably pre
dicted from demographic and clinical variables, and are frequently mis
understood by surrogates and physicians. Elicitation of patient prefer
ences regarding permanent nursing home placement should be explored be
fore patients become unable to participate in decision making in order
to enhance the concordance of patient preference with the way they sp
end the end of their lives.