A. Kracher, The study of religion: Conversation point for theology and science - Phenomenology and theology-reflections on the study of religion, ZYGON, 35(4), 2000, pp. 827-848
The academic study of religious belief and practice is frequently taken to
debunk the content of religion. This attitude impedes the science-theology
dialogue and causes believers to react defensively toward studies of religi
on. I argue that a large, although not unrestricted, domain exists in which
phenomenology of religion is neutral with respect to content, that is, com
patible with either belief or unbelief. Theology can constructively interac
t with secular studies of religion, in some cases even explicitly hostile o
nes. Three themes emerge chat elaborate on this interaction: (1) the claim
that a scientific study of religion is capable of refuting belief is a logi
cal mistake; (2) religious practice, and to some extent belief, can benefit
from secular scrutiny; (3) the entirety of religious expressions is richer
than the content that can be captured by analytical study of the phenomeno
n.