MR OF MALIGNANT NASOSINUSAL NEOPLASMS - FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
Citation
R. Maroldi et al., MR OF MALIGNANT NASOSINUSAL NEOPLASMS - FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS, European journal of radiology, 24(3), 1997, pp. 181-190
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
SICI code
0720-048X(1997)24:3<181:MOMNN->2.0.ZU;2-C
Abstract
This paper focuses on the role of MR imaging of malignant neoplasms th
rough a particular layout that emphasizes: (a) the rationale for the a
pplication of imaging; (b) the factors influencing the selection of se
quences, planes and their proper arrangement; (c) the correlation betw
een MR findings, imaging staging and clinical decision making. Since i
n most cases surgery is the treatment of choice, the precise assessmen
t of the local extent and spread of tumour plays a key role in plannin
g the surgical approach and influences either the therapy and the prog
nosis. However, the degree of spatial/anatomical detail required in tr
eatment planning significantly differs between surgery and radiotherap
y. Planning of the examination technique focuses on: (a) assembling se
quences and planes in the shortest time possible; (b) the solution of
specific problems: distinction between neoplasm and retained secretion
s within nasosinusal cavities; staging of submucosal spread toward the
anterior cranial fossa, the orbit, the pterygo-palatine and superior
orbital fissures. Since the most effective barrier to spread of neopla
sms beyond sinusal walls does not depend on the mineral content of bon
e, but on the periosteum, assessment of the integrity of periorbita or
dura mater is an essential information. Although MR cannot detect foc
al erosions of the thin sinusal walls, it reliably demonstrates both r
esidual barriers (periorbita and dura), even though the bone has been
completely destroyed. However, the final decision concerning orbital e
xenteration is made according to intraoperative staging. MR imaging ca
n accurately precise the degree of anterior cranial fossa involvement.
Furthermore, since either MR and CT accurately indicate the need to p
erform an anterior craniofacial resection and adequately exclude neopl
astic invasion requiring orbital exenteration, more comparative studie
s are required to demonstrate that MR preoperative staging of nasosinu
sal malignancies is cost-effective. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science Ireland
Ltd.