This study examined the applicability of three different pain rating scales
, the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), the Graphic Rating Scale (GRS) and the N
umeric Rating Scale (NRS), in geriatric patients. Data collection was perfo
rmed in a geriatric clinic at a university hospital. A structured interview
was conducted with 167 patients (mean age=80.5 years). Patients rated thei
r current experience of pain twice with a 5-minute pause in-between on the
VAS, GRS and NRS, and were then asked if they experienced pain, ache or hur
t (PAH) or other symptoms. The correlations were high and significant both
between the ratings of the VAS, GRS and NRS (r=0.78-0.92; p<0.001) (alterna
tive-forms reliability), and between the test and retesting (r=0.75 - r=0.8
3; p<0.001) (test-retest reliability). A logistic regression analysis showe
d that the probability to accomplish a rating on the pain scales decreased
with advancing age of the patient, and this was especially marked for the V
AS. The probability of agreement between the patients' ratings of pain and
the verbal report of PAH tended to decrease with advancing age; this was es
pecially so for the VAS. Patients who verbally denied PAH but reported pain
on the scales rated it significant lower (p<0.001) than those who verbally
reported PAH and rated the pain as well. Eighteen percent of patients who
denied pain but rated a pain experience verbally expressed suffering or dis
tress. The study suggests that pain rating scales such as the VAS, GRS and
NRS can be used to evaluate pain experience in geriatric patients. However,
agreement between verbally expressed experience of PAH, and the rated expe
rience of pain tended to decrease with advancing age. This indicates that t
he pain-evaluating process will be substantially improved by an additional
penetration supported by a wide variety of expression of hurt, ache, pain,
discomfort and distress. (C)2000, Editrice Kurtis.