Cj. Cherpitel et G. Borges, Performance of screening instruments for alcohol problems in the ER: A comparison of Mexican-Americans and Mexicans in Mexico, AM J DRUG A, 26(4), 2000, pp. 683-702
The performance of standard screening instruments and alternate measures ag
ainst ICD-10 (International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision) and
DSM-IV (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th revision
) criteria for alcohol dependence and separately for harmful drinking/abuse
were compared between probability samples of 1511 emergency room (ER) pati
ents from three hospitals in Pachuca, Mexico, and 586 Mexican-American ER p
atients in Santa Clara County, California. Sensitivity was highest for the
Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT), TWEAK, and Rapid Alcohol
Problems Screen (RAPS) for alcohol dependence; sensitivity was highest for
holding five or more drinks for harmful drinking/abuse in both samples. Al
l instruments performed better for alcohol dependence than for abuse/harmfu
l drinking. Arrests for drinking and driving performed better in Santa Clar
a than in Pachuca, while a positive Breathalyzer reading and reporting drin
king prior to the event performed better in Pachuca; both were significantl
y more sensitive among the injured compared to the noninjured in Pachuca. T
he data suggest that instrument performance may be similar between those in
Pachuca and those in the low acculturation group in Santa Clara, relative
to those scoring higher on acculturation. While standard screening instrume
nts appear to work reasonably well in both samples for alcohol dependence,
variation across gender. injury, and acculturation subgroups suggests atten
tion should be given to choosing the ''best'' instrument.