Bayesian inference is increasingly used in estimating model parameters for
fish-stock assessment, because of its ability to incorporate uncertainty an
d prior knowledge and to provide information for risk analyses in evaluatin
g alternative management strategies. Normal distributions are commonly used
in formulating likelihood functions and informative prior distributions; t
hese are sensitive to data outliers and mis-specification of prior distribu
tions, both common problems in fisheries-stock assessment. Using a length-s
tructured stock-assessment model for a New Zealand abalone fishery as an ex
ample, we evaluate the robustness of three likelihood functions and two pri
or-distribution functions, with respect to outliers and mis-specification o
f priors, in 48 different combinations. The two robust likelihood estimator
s performed slightly less well when no data outliers were present and much
better when data outliers were present. Similarly, the Cauchy distribution
was less sensitive to prior mis-specification than the normal distribution.
We conclude that replacing the normal distribution with "fat-tailed" distr
ibutions for likelihoods and priors can improve Bayesian assessments when t
here are data outliers and mis-specification of priors, with relatively min
or costs when there are none.