Genetic control of cold hardiness in two-year-old seedlings was compared wi
th that in 7-year-old saplings of 40 open-pollinated families in each of tw
o breeding populations (Coast and Cascade) of coastal Douglas-fir (Pseudots
uga menziesii var. menziesii (Mirb.) Franco) from western Oregon. In additi
on, the efficacy of bud phenology traits as predictors of cold hardiness at
the two stages was explored. Fall and spring cold hardiness were assessed
using artificial freeze testing. Similar genetic control of cold hardiness
in seedlings and saplings is suggested by strong type-B genetic correlation
s (r(B)) between the two ages for fall and spring cold injury traits (r(B)
greater than or equal to 0.78) and by similar trends in individual tree her
itability estimates (h(i)(2)), e.g., h(i)(2) was greater in spring ((h) ove
r bar (2)(i) = 0.73) than in fall ((h) over bar (2)(i) 0.36) and greater in
the Coast population ((h) over bar (2)(i) = 0.69) than in the Cascade popu
lation ((h) over bar (2)(i) = 0.40) at both ages. Strong responses to direc
t selection are expected for spring cold hardiness at both ages and for fal
l cold hardiness in seedlings, even under mild selection intensities. Simil
ar heritabilities in seedlings and saplings, and strong genetic correlation
s between ages for cold-hardiness traits, ensure that selection at one age
will produce similar gains at the other age. Type-A genetic correlations (r
(A)) between fall and spring cold hardiness were near zero in the Cascade p
opulation (r(A) = 0.08 and -0.14 at ages 2 and 7, respectively) but were mo
derate and negative in the Coast population (r(A) = -0.54 and -0.36, respec
tively). Bud-burst timing appears to be a suitable surrogate to artificial
freeze testing for assessing spring cold hardiness in both seedlings and sa
plings, as is bud set timing for assessing fall cold hardiness in seedlings
, but bud set timing is a poor predictor of fall cold hardiness in saplings
.