Anaesthesia and analgesia for major lower limb amputation

Citation
Wb. Campbell et al., Anaesthesia and analgesia for major lower limb amputation, CARDIOV SUR, 8(7), 2000, pp. 572-575
Citations number
15
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems
Journal title
CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY
ISSN journal
09672109 → ACNP
Volume
8
Issue
7
Year of publication
2000
Pages
572 - 575
Database
ISI
SICI code
0967-2109(200012)8:7<572:AAAFML>2.0.ZU;2-Q
Abstract
This study describes the methods of anaesthesia and analgesia used in 349 m ajor lower limb amputations for vascular disease over a seven year period ( 1992-8). The main type of anaesthesia was general in 55%, spinal in 29%. an d epidural in 14%: there were no significant differences for ASA grade, age , or amputation level, nor any statistical differences in mortality for eac h method of anaesthesia. The main methods of analgesia in the first 48 hour s changed between 1992 and 1998, with decreasing intramuscular and oral opi oids (from 38% to 7%, and from 23% to 2% respectively) while epidurals beca me the commonest method (4% in 1992 and 63% in 1998). Thirty seven percent of patients were prescribed carbamazepine for phantom pain. There have been substantial changes in postoperative analgesia following amputation. and e pidurals are now common practice. despite the controversy about their role in preventing phantom pain. (C) 2000 The International Society for Cardiova scular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.