C. Hanssonlundblad et al., RETINAL EXAMINATION INTERVALS IN DIABETIC-PATIENTS ON DIET TREATMENT ONLY, Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica, 75(3), 1997, pp. 244-248
Purpose: The aim of the present study was to examine whether type 2 di
abetic patients with good metabolic control achieved on diet treatment
only, developed sight-threatening retinopathy during a four-year foll
ow-up period. Methods: A retrospective four-year follow-up study was c
arried out including all diabetic patients on diet treatment only, reg
istered at the out-patient clinic at the Department of Medicine and re
ferred for fundus photography to the Department of Ophthalmology in 19
89 as well as all patients referred from primary care units for fundus
photography during 1988 and 1989. One hundred and seventeen diabetic
patients treated with diet only were examined with fundus photography
after remittance, and after two and four years. Results: Age at diabet
es diagnosis was 58.8 +/- 13.8 years (mean +/- SD), age at baseline wa
s 61.5 +/- 13.6 years, and diabetes duration was 2.7 +/- 3.1 years. Du
ring the four-year follow-up period, 48 of the patients (41%) remained
on diet treatment only whereas diabetes treatment was changed in 66 (
56%), from diet to oral agents only in 57 (49%), and from diet to insu
lin alone or in combination with oral agents in 9 (8%) of the patients
. One hundred and six patients (91%) did not have any retinopathy at b
aseline and 11 patients (9%) had minimal background retinopathy. At fo
llow-up, there were no signs of retinopathy in 93 patients (79%), 22 (
19%) had minimal background retinopathy, and two had developed moderat
e background retinopathy. Out of those patients who were still on diet
at follow-up, five (10%) had developed minimal background retinopathy
. Mean blood glucose and HbA1c levels, registered every year during th
e observation period, were higher at most time points in patients who
received oral agents or insulin treatment compared to those who were t
reated with diet only during the entire observation period. No differe
nces were observed between patients who received oral agents and those
who received insulin alone or in combination with oral agents. Conclu
sion: It is suggested, that if the initial retinal examination reveals
no or minimal diabetic retinopathy at the time of diagnosis of type 2
diabetes mellitus, the second examination can be postponed at least 4
years in patients with good metabolic control on diet treatment only.