Dg. Besselsen et al., Effect of mouse strain and age on detection of mouse parvovirus 1 by use of serologic testing and polymerase chain reaction analysis, COMPAR MED, 50(5), 2000, pp. 498-502
Background and Purpose: Detection of mouse parvovirus 1 (MPV) depends on us
e of serologic and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays. These assays wer
e evaluated for their ability to detect virus specific antibodies or viral
DNA in multiple strains and ages of mice inoculated with MPV.
Methods: Twelve-week-old ICR, BALB/c, C3H, C57BL/6, and DBA/2 mice and four
- and eight-week-old ICR mice were inoculated with MPV. Serum was harvested
four weeks after inoculation and analyzed by use of recombinant non struct
ural protein 1 (rNS1) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), minute vir
us of mice (MVM) ELISA, and MPV indirect fluorescent antibody (IFA), MVM IF
A, and MPV hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) assays. Select tissues were ha
rvested and analyzed by use of an MPV-specific PCR assay.
Results: The number of mice in each group with detectable MPV-specific anti
bodies or MPV DNA varied with mouse strain, mouse age when inoculated, and
viral dose. Seroconversion in mice inoculated at 12 weeks of age was detect
ed almost exclusively by use of the MPV IFA and MPV HAI assays, whereas ser
oconversion in almost all mice inoculated at 4 and 8 weeks of age was detec
ted by use of all immunoassays except the MVM ELISA, Viral DNA was detected
by use of PCR analysis in all strains and ages of mice except DBA/2 mice.
Conclusions: Mouse strain and age have important roles in seroconversion to
nonstructural and structural MPV antigens and persistence of viral DNA in
mouse tissues. Therefore, diagnostic serologic testing and PCR analysis sho
uld be considered within the context of mouse strain and age at the time of
MPV exposure, especially when sentinel mice are used for surveillance.