Pediatric cardiac output measurement using surface integration of velocityvectors: An in vivo validation study

Citation
Ms. Chew et al., Pediatric cardiac output measurement using surface integration of velocityvectors: An in vivo validation study, CRIT CARE M, 28(11), 2000, pp. 3664-3671
Citations number
45
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care
Journal title
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
ISSN journal
00903493 → ACNP
Volume
28
Issue
11
Year of publication
2000
Pages
3664 - 3671
Database
ISI
SICI code
0090-3493(200011)28:11<3664:PCOMUS>2.0.ZU;2-I
Abstract
Objective: To test Be accuracy and reproducibility of systemic cardiac outp ut (CO) measurements using surface integration of velocity vectors (SIVV) i n a pediatric animal model with hemodynamic instability and to compare SIVV with traditional pulsed-wave Doppler measurements. Design:Prospective, comparative study. Setting: Animal research laboratory at a university medical center. Subjects:Eight piglets weighing 10-15 kg. Interventions: Hemodynamic instability was induced by using inhalation of i soflurane and infusions of colloid and dobutamine. Measurements: SIVV CO was measured at the left ventricular outflow tract, t he aortic valve, and ascending aorta. Transit time CO was used as the refer ence standard. Results:There was good agreement between SIVV and transit time CO. At high frame rates, the mean difference +/- 2 so between the two methods was 0.01 +/- 0.27 L/min for measurements at the left ventricular outflow tract, 0.08 +/- 0.26 L/min for the ascending aorta, and 0.06 +/- 0.25 L/min for the ao rtic valve. At low frame rates, measurements were 0.06 +/- 0.25, 0.19 +/- 0 .32, and 0.14 +/- 0.30 L/min for the left ventricular outflow tract, ascend ing aorta, and aortic valve, respectively. There were no differences betwee n the three sites at high frame rates. Agreement between pulsed-wave Dopple r and transit time CO was poorer, with a mean difference +/- 2 so of 0.09 /- 0.93 L/min. Repeated SIVV measurements taken at a period of relative hem odynamic stability differed by a mean difference +/-2 so of 0.01 +/- 0.22 L /min, with a coefficient of variation = 7.6%. Intraobserver coefficients of variation were 5.7%, 4.9%, and 4.1% at the left ventricular outflow tract, ascending aorta, and aortic valve, respectively. Interobserver variability was also small, with a coefficient of variation = 8.5%. Conclusions: SIVV is an accurate and reproducible flow measurement techniqu e. It is a considerable improvement over currently used methods and is appl icable to pediatric critical care.