Jl. Nates et al., Percutaneous tracheostomy in critically ill patients: A prospective, randomized comparison of two techniques, CRIT CARE M, 28(11), 2000, pp. 3734-3739
Objective: To prospectively compare two commonly used methods for percutane
ous dilational tracheostomy (PDT) in critically ill patients.
Design: Prospective, randomized, clinical trial.
Setting: Trauma and general intensive care units of a university tertiary t
eaching hospital, which is also a level 1 trauma center.
Patients: One hundred critically ill patients with an indication for PDT.
Interventions: PDT with the Ciaglia technique using the Ciaglia PDT introdu
cer set and the Griggs technique using a Griggs PDT kit and guidewire dilat
ing forceps.
Measurements and Main Results: Surgical time, difficulties, and surgical an
d anesthesia complications were measured at 0-2 hrs, 24 hrs, and 7 days pos
tprocedure. Groups were well matched, and there were no differences between
the two methods in surgical time or in anesthesia complications. Major ble
eding complications were 4.4 times more frequent with the Griggs PDT kit. W
ith the Ciaglia PDT kit, both intraoperative and at 2 and 24 hrs, surgical
complications were less common (p = .023) and the procedure was more often
completed without expert assistance (p = .013). Tracheostomy bleeding was n
ot associated with either anticoagulant therapy or an abnormal clotting pro
file. Multivariate analysis identified the predictors of PDT complications
as the Griggs PDT kit (p = .027) and the Acute Physiology and Chronic Healt
h Evaluation (APACHE) II score (p = .041). The significant predictors of ti
me required to complete PDT were the APACHE II score (p = .041), a less exp
erienced operator (p = .0001), and a female patient (p = .013).
Conclusions: Patients experiencing PDT with the Ciaglia PDT kit had a lower
surgical complication rate (2% vs. 25%), less operative and postoperative
bleeding, and less overall technical difficulties than did patients undergo
ing PDT with the Griggs PDT kit Ciaglia PDT is, therefore, the preferred te
chnique for percutaneous tracheostomy in critically ill patients.