Percutaneous tracheostomy in critically ill patients: A prospective, randomized comparison of two techniques

Citation
Jl. Nates et al., Percutaneous tracheostomy in critically ill patients: A prospective, randomized comparison of two techniques, CRIT CARE M, 28(11), 2000, pp. 3734-3739
Citations number
33
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care
Journal title
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
ISSN journal
00903493 → ACNP
Volume
28
Issue
11
Year of publication
2000
Pages
3734 - 3739
Database
ISI
SICI code
0090-3493(200011)28:11<3734:PTICIP>2.0.ZU;2-W
Abstract
Objective: To prospectively compare two commonly used methods for percutane ous dilational tracheostomy (PDT) in critically ill patients. Design: Prospective, randomized, clinical trial. Setting: Trauma and general intensive care units of a university tertiary t eaching hospital, which is also a level 1 trauma center. Patients: One hundred critically ill patients with an indication for PDT. Interventions: PDT with the Ciaglia technique using the Ciaglia PDT introdu cer set and the Griggs technique using a Griggs PDT kit and guidewire dilat ing forceps. Measurements and Main Results: Surgical time, difficulties, and surgical an d anesthesia complications were measured at 0-2 hrs, 24 hrs, and 7 days pos tprocedure. Groups were well matched, and there were no differences between the two methods in surgical time or in anesthesia complications. Major ble eding complications were 4.4 times more frequent with the Griggs PDT kit. W ith the Ciaglia PDT kit, both intraoperative and at 2 and 24 hrs, surgical complications were less common (p = .023) and the procedure was more often completed without expert assistance (p = .013). Tracheostomy bleeding was n ot associated with either anticoagulant therapy or an abnormal clotting pro file. Multivariate analysis identified the predictors of PDT complications as the Griggs PDT kit (p = .027) and the Acute Physiology and Chronic Healt h Evaluation (APACHE) II score (p = .041). The significant predictors of ti me required to complete PDT were the APACHE II score (p = .041), a less exp erienced operator (p = .0001), and a female patient (p = .013). Conclusions: Patients experiencing PDT with the Ciaglia PDT kit had a lower surgical complication rate (2% vs. 25%), less operative and postoperative bleeding, and less overall technical difficulties than did patients undergo ing PDT with the Griggs PDT kit Ciaglia PDT is, therefore, the preferred te chnique for percutaneous tracheostomy in critically ill patients.