Mouth-to-mouth and bag-valve-mask ventilation have been an indispensable pa
rt of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), However, only recently have the
effects of different tidal volumes on arterial oxygenation been reported fo
r mouth-to-mouth and bag-valve-mask ventilation, Currently recommended tida
l volumes (10-15 mL/kg) are associated with an increased risk of gastric in
flation because they produce high peak inspiratory pressures, An animal mod
el of ventilation with an unprotected airway showed that a smaller tidal vo
lume (6 mL/kg) is as effective as a larger tidal volume (12 mL/kg) in maint
aining Sao(2) at >96%. However, a smaller tidal volume with exhaled gas ven
tilation produced a mean Sao(2) of 48%, which is ineffective. Ventilation g
as mixtures have been studied in models of cardiac arrest and CPR, One stud
y showed that ventilation with air during 6 mins of CPH resulted In a retur
n of spontaneous circulation in 10 of 12 animals compared with only 5 of 12
animals ventilated with exhaled gas (p < .04), Arterial and mixed-venous P
o-2 were significantly higher, and Pco(2) was significantly lower in the ai
r ventilation group. Investigations of the cardiovascular effects of mouth-
to-mouth ventilation during CPR suggest that there are adverse effects duri
ng low blood flow states. However, mouth-to-mouth ventilation during respir
atory arrest is lifesaving and should continue to be taught and emphasized
In basic life support courses.