Ms. Clark et al., HABITATS AND MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATED WITH COMMON GROUND BEETLES (COLEOPTERA, CARABIDAE) IN A MICHIGAN AGRICULTURAL LANDSCAPE, Environmental entomology, 26(3), 1997, pp. 519-527
The associations between common ground beetles and habitat and managem
ent characteristics were studied in an agricultural landscape that com
prised part of the Long-Term Ecological Research site in southwestern
Michigan. The 42-ha area included 7 habitat treatments, which represen
ted 4 annual cropping systems in wheat, Triticum aestivum L., corn, Ze
a mays L., soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr., rotation; 2 perennial crop
systems (alfalfa, Medicago sativa L., and Populus); and a native succ
ession habitat. Pitfall traps were used to sample adult ground beetles
during the growing seasons of 1994 and 1995. Four species numerically
dominated the trap catches and together accounted for 87% of the tota
l specimens collected: Cyclotrachelus sodalis (LeConte), Poecilus lucu
blandus (Say), Pterostichus melanarius (Illiger), and Agonum placidum
(Say). Differences in representation of these common species were most
pronounced between perennial and annual plant systems. However, tilla
ge also influenced the relative abundance of these species. The adult-
overwintering, spring-breeding species, P. lucublandus and A. placidum
, were most common in the annual crop habitats, particularly those und
er conventional tillage. Catch numbers of these 2 species were correla
ted positively suggesting similar habitat preferences or responses to
management practices. In contrast, C. sodalis, a larval-overwintering,
autumn breeder, was most common in the perennial crop systems and the
annual crop system receiving no tillage. The exotic species P. melana
rius showed the least response to the agricultural habitat treatments
but was more abundant in managed crop habitats compared with the unman
aged succession habitat. Cluster analysis based on these 4 species ind
icated that plant type and tillage were important in distiniquishing t
he carabids of these habitats. The potential implications of these fin
dings for conserving or enhancing ground beetle populations in agricul
tural systems are discussed.