Let K = {K-0,..., K-k} be a family of convex bodies in R-n, 1 less than or
equal to k less than or equal to n - 1. We prove, generalizing results from
[9], [10], [13], and [14], that there always exists an affine k-dimensiona
l plane A(k) subset of or equal to R-n, called a common maximal k-transvers
al of K, such that, for each i is an element of {0,..., k} and each x is an
element of R-n,
V-k(K-i boolean AND A(k)) greater than or equal to V-k(K-i boolean AND (A(k
) + x)),
where V-k is the k-dimensional Lebesgue measure in A(k) and A(k) + x. Given
a family K = {K-i}(i=0)(l) of convex bodies in R-n, l < k, the set C-k(K)
Of all common maximal k-transversals of K is not only nonempty but has to b
e "large" both from the measure theoretic and the topological point of view
. It is shown that C-k(K) cannot be included in a v-dimensional C-1 submani
fold(or more generally in an (H-v, v)-rectifiable, H-v-measurable subset) o
f the affine Grassmannian AGr(n,k) of all affine k-dimensional planes of R-
n, of O(n + 1)-invariant v-dimensional (Hausdorff) measure less than some p
ositive constant c(n,k,i), where v = (k - l)(n - k). As usual, the "affine"
Grassmannian AGr(n,k) is viewed as a subspace of the Grassmannian Gr(n+1,k
+1) of all linear (k + 1)-dimensional subspaces of Rn+1. On the topological
side we show that there exists a nonzero cohomology class <theta> is an el
ement of Hn-k(G(n+1,k+1); Z(2)) such that the class theta (l+1) is concentr
ated in an arbitrarily small neighborhood of C-k(K) AS an immediate consequ
ence we deduce that the Lyusternik-Shnirel'man category of the space C-k(K)
relative to Gr(n+1,k+1) is greater than or equal to k - l. Finally, we sho
w that there exists a link between these two results by showing that a coho
mologically "big" subspace of Gr(n+1,k+1) has to be large also in a measure
theoretic sense.