Background: An adequate knowledge of physiological variation is important f
ur valid comparative studies of tear proteins. The aim of this study was to
investigate the between-day variation of the human tear protein levels, in
cluding the total protein concentration (TPC and the levels of major protei
n fi actions. Two sampling methods, the yawn and the eye-flush methods, wer
e used and compared. Methods: TPC was determined by the Bradford method. Th
e major protein fractions were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacry
lamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and their levels were determined by s
canning densitometry after SDS-PAGE, The tear protein levels were monitored
fur 3 days. Results: The between-day differences in the levels of TPC and
the individual protein fractions were not statistically significant in eith
er sampling method, but the variations of some proteins were large and woul
d be clinically significant. Different variations were observed in differen
t proteins. The variations in serum albumin were large, up to 61% and 113%
in the yawn and eye-flush methods respectively. The variations in lactoferr
in, tear-specific prealbumin and lysozyme were relatively small in the yawn
method. The variations in protein levels obtained by the eye-flush method
were generally higher than by the yawn method. Conclusion: Although the bet
ween-day differences in tear protein levels were not statistically signific
ant, the variations in some proteins would be large in magnitude. The varia
bility of tear protein levels obtained by the eye-flush method was larger t
han that by the yawn method. Therefore, caution should be taken if the eye-
flush method is used for sampling tears for quantitative analysis of tear p
roteins, although it is easier to collect tear samples using this method. T
he rt suits will be useful to exclude normal variation in tear protein leve
ls when comparing pre- and post-therapeutic tear protein levels in eyes tre
ated for tear-related abnormalities.