Scanning laser polarimetry, retinal nerve fiber layer photography, and perimetry in the diagnosis of glaucomatous nerve fiber defects

Citation
S. Kremmer et al., Scanning laser polarimetry, retinal nerve fiber layer photography, and perimetry in the diagnosis of glaucomatous nerve fiber defects, GR ARCH CL, 238(11), 2000, pp. 922-926
Citations number
23
Categorie Soggetti
Optalmology
Journal title
GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY
ISSN journal
0721832X → ACNP
Volume
238
Issue
11
Year of publication
2000
Pages
922 - 926
Database
ISI
SICI code
0721-832X(200011)238:11<922:SLPRNF>2.0.ZU;2-G
Abstract
Background: Retinal nerve fiber layer defects are part of early glaucomatou s damage. In the present study, we compared the ability of retinal nerve fi ber layer photography (NFP) and scanning laser polarimetry (SLP) to detect nerve fiber layer defects in glaucoma patients. Methods: Besides ophthalmol ogical standard examinations, we performed NFP (Zeiss Ikon fundus camera 30 degrees, green filter), SLP (GDx, 1.0.14 and 2.0.09, LDT) and automated pe rimetry (Oculus, Twinfield, 30 degrees) in 150 glaucoma patients [74 with p rimary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and 76 with normal-tension glaucoma (NTG) ]. The perimetric results were evaluated according to a modified Aulhorn cl assification. NFP and SLP were graded according to Quigley. Results: In POA G, 42% of NFP and 5% of SLP were not evaluable. In NTG, 24% of NFP and 4% o f SLP were not evaluable. In POAG, NFP and SLP revealed a direct agreement in 54.5%, and in NTG, 55%; there was a small difference of one stage in 39. 5% (POAG) and 41% (NTG). In POAG, NFP / SLP showed agreement with perimetri c results in 35%/30% of cases and differences of one stage in 56%/58%. In N TG. NFP / SLP agreed with perimetry in 52%/48% of cases and differed by onl y one stage in 32%/39%. Larger deviations were found in less than 13% of th e cases. Conclusions: NFP and SLP mostly showed good agreement or little de viation as to grading of nerve fiber layer damage. In clinical use, SLP has advantages over NFP because a higher rate of good-quality images can be ob tained and pupils do not have to be dilated. Additionally, SLP measurements provide quantitative data and a large normative data base exists.