Water accumulation in metered dose inhaler spacers under normal mechanicalventilation conditions

Citation
Jb. Waugh et Jb. Waugh, Water accumulation in metered dose inhaler spacers under normal mechanicalventilation conditions, HEART LUNG, 29(6), 2000, pp. 424-428
Citations number
4
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems
Journal title
HEART & LUNG
ISSN journal
01479563 → ACNP
Volume
29
Issue
6
Year of publication
2000
Pages
424 - 428
Database
ISI
SICI code
0147-9563(200011/12)29:6<424:WAIMDI>2.0.ZU;2-3
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the water accumulation in 3 types of metered dose inhaler (MDI) spacer shapes in-line in a ventila tor circuit, in 2 positions over 2-, 4-, and 6-hour time periods through th e use of heated- and nonheated-wire ventilator circuits. DESIGN:The study design was prospective, quasiexperimental, and random assi gnment. SETTING: The study was conducted in a university laboratory. MATERIALS: Three brands of MDI spacers (OptiVent, ACE, AeroVent) were teste d. OUTCOME MEASURES: Grams of water accumulation were measured. INTERVENTION: Distilled water accumulation was measured in 3 brands of MDI spacers in 0 degrees and 45 degrees positions at 2-, 4-, and 6-hour time in tervals. Water accumulation was measured in each spacer by calculating the differences between pretest (dry) weights and posttest (wet) wrights throug h the use of an analytical balance; A Marquest SCT-3000 servo-controlled hu midifier with heated-wire ventilator circuit was used with a room temperatu re range of 21.7 degreesC-22.8 degreesC (71 degrees -73 degreesF) and a rel ative humidity range of 57%-65%. RESULTS: Multivariate repeated measures analysis demonstrated a difference between brands (P < .001). The amount of water accumulated during 6 hours ( time variable) was significantly different (P < .001), as was the interacti on between time and "spacer brand" (with Greenhouse-Geisser adjustment). Th e interaction of time and position was also significantly different (P = .0 01). Water accumulations at a 45 degrees angle were: AeroVent 0.765 +/- 0.1 52 g; OptiVent 1.894 +/- 0.228 g; and BCE 4.043 +/- 0.665 g through 6 hours of use. CONCLUSIONS: We found that water accumulation was a result of the type of s pacer, position of the spacer, and lime that the spacer was left in-line. A ll 3 brands of spacer collected less than 5 mt of water over 6 hours in eit her position. Heated-wire circuits accumulated less water than nonheated-wi re circuits and may be safer when using MDI spacers.