The early detection of alcohol consumption (EDAC) score in the identification of heavy and at-risk drinkers from routine blood tests

Citation
Jw. Harasymiw et al., The early detection of alcohol consumption (EDAC) score in the identification of heavy and at-risk drinkers from routine blood tests, J ADDICT D, 19(3), 2000, pp. 43-59
Citations number
34
Categorie Soggetti
Public Health & Health Care Science
Journal title
JOURNAL OF ADDICTIVE DISEASES
ISSN journal
10550887 → ACNP
Volume
19
Issue
3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
43 - 59
Database
ISI
SICI code
1055-0887(2000)19:3<43:TEDOAC>2.0.ZU;2-N
Abstract
The objective of this study was to use the EDAC score to detect heavy and a t-risk drinking in young adults (mean age 25 years) and compare the results to self-reports. The EDAC score is a linear discriminant function (LDF) de rived from the analysis of a combination of up to 35 blood chemistry and he matology analytes ordered routinely in clinical settings. Subjects (N = 150 ) were recruited from medical care facilities at the University of Missouri , Columbia. Blood samples, obtained from males (N = 66) and females (N = 84 ), were sent to LabCorp (Burlington, NC) for analysis. The blood chemistry panels were evaluated using a Linear Discriminant Function method available through SPSS software to predict whether each individual was a Heavy Drink er or an At-Risk Drinker. Heavy Drinkers consumed on average greater than o r equal to 4 drinks daily for males and greater than or equal to 3 drinks d aily for females. At-Risk Drinkers consumed at least 14 drinks per week or drank more than 4 drinks on any occasion in the last 14 days if male and co nsumed at least 7 drinks per week or more than 3 drinks on any occasion if female. Not-Heavy Drinkers and Not-At-Risk Drinkers consumed less than the amounts above. The results showed 8/10 (80%) males and 2/2 women identified as Heavy Drinkers by both the EDAC score (prior probability Not-Heavy vs. Heavy Drinker = 0.5:0.5) and self-report. Fifty of 56 (89%) males and 65/82 (79%) of females were identified as Not-Heavy Drinkers by both EDAC score and self-report. There were 6/54 males and 15/82 (18%) women with false pos itive results, of these, 14/21 (67%) met dependence criteria by DSM-IV. The EDAC test showed 30% sensitivity and 96% specificity when identifying At-R isk drinking males and 42% sensitivity and 90% specificity when identifying At-Risk drinking females. In females, the EDAC's sensitivity was higher th an any single traditional or new laboratory marker previously reported fur diagnosis of alcohol abuse such as GGT, MCV and CDT. As a complement or a s ubstitute to an interview, in subjects who are less candid about their drin king, the EDAC is a useful tool to assess heavy and at-risk alcohol consump tion in young adults.