In 1995, a 10-university consortium approach to deliver a post-baccalaureat
e primary care nurse practitioner programme funded by the Ontario Ministry
of Health was launched throughout Ontario, Canada. A combination of traditi
onal and distance teaching methods, in English and French, were used. A 5-y
ear research project was initiated to evaluate the entire programme, the ef
fect of nurse practitioners on patient and health-care system outcomes and
examine practice patterns. Participants included deans and directors (n = 1
0), regional co-ordinators (n = 5) and course developers, some of whom were
also course professors (n = 8). This article is a report of the evaluation
of the consortium programme after the first year from the perspective of g
roups involved in implementation and delivery. Results of qualitative analy
ses of participant perceptions from researcher-led focus groups and asynchr
onous electronic interviews provided the framework for the evaluation, and
revealed the rationale for the consortium method, strengths, limitations an
d recommendations. Sharing ideas, resources and delivery and increased stud
ent access in remote areas were perceived as positive outcomes. Limitations
included the short time period to develop programme content, identify and
plan for distance education resources, and too little communication between
universities and students. Researchers concluded that the consortium appro
ach was effective for nurse practitioner education. Key factors identified
for programme planning were communication, resources, curriculum and worklo
ad. Included among the recommendations was to allow sufficient time for rol
e and course development before beginning a similar programme.